Will it be a slam dunk for the US sports betting restriction?
By Natalie Sherman
reporter, New york city
bit.ly
A ban on sports betting in a lot of US states could be reversed by a case being thought about by the Supreme Court.
The state of New Jersey is challenging the 1992 federal law that largely banned sports betting gaming, explaining the matter as a "states' rights" problem.
The case, which started on Monday, comes after New Jersey homeowners enacted 2011 to legalise sports betting.
A group of sports betting leagues opposes wagering on video games, which they fear will motivate match-fixing.
Lower courts have actually consistently ruled against New Jersey, saying it is within the federal government's power to limit a state's policy alternatives.
The Supreme Court decided to hear the case nonetheless in the middle of a broader shift in American mindsets toward sports betting.
bet9ja.com
Before 1976, Nevada - home of the Las Vegas strip - was the only state with legal gambling establishments outside Native American lands.
bit.ly
But in the last few years, states hungry for tax income in the wake of the financial crash have actually enacted a rash of looser gambling laws, collecting significant levies on gambling revenue.
There are now 24 states with business gambling establishments - roughly double the number a years earlier.
Despite the official restriction, which already exempts Nevada and three other states, unlawful sports betting is swarming in the US.
Americans put about $154bn in prohibited sports betting bets every year, according to the American Gaming Association.
The association's president, Geoff Freeman, explained the federal restriction, external as an "utter failure" earlier this year.
It states the UK is an example of a nation where sports betting is commonplace.
"It's time for Washington to stop depriving states of important tax income and enable them to reap the benefits of a regulated market," Mr Freeman said.
More than 15 states submitted documents in support of New Jersey in the case. A handful have currently passed laws to authorise sports betting in case of a modification.
'Times have actually altered'
On Monday, as lawyers began arguments for the Supreme Court, some more conservative judges appeared sceptical of the existing law.
The court is expected to decide in June 2018.
"If we are successful here we might have bets being taken in New Jersey within two weeks of a decision by the court," stated outbound New Jersey governor Chris Christie after participating in the court hearing. "We're prepared in New Jersey - we're ready to go."
bet9ja.com
Despite the court's final judgment, Congress might also take up the dispute amidst broader conversation about online gaming and e-sports betting.
Even some of the expert sports betting leagues have actually begun to change their positions on the question of gambling.
Adam Silver, National Basketball Association commissioner, supported a federal law that would develop a consistent set of rules across the US. "Times have changed," he composed in a 2014 opinion piece, external.
Addicts fighting with mobile wagering
bit.ly
3 October 2017
bet9ja.com
The tricky problem of problem gambling
31 August 2017
1
Will it be a Slam Dunk for the US Sports Betting Ban?
hungsheehy038 edited this page 4 days ago