andert

For Christmas I received a fascinating present from a friend - my extremely own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (fantastic title) bears my name and my image on its cover, and it has radiant reviews.

Yet it was completely written by AI, with a few basic prompts about me provided by my pal Janet.

It's an interesting read, and very amusing in parts. But it also meanders rather a lot, and is somewhere between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It simulates my chatty style of writing, however it's likewise a bit repetitive, and very verbose. It might have gone beyond Janet's prompts in collecting data about me.

Several sentences start "as a leading innovation journalist ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There's also a mysterious, repetitive hallucination in the type of my feline (I have no family pets). And there's a metaphor on nearly every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of business online offering AI -book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I got in touch with the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had actually offered around 150,000 customised books, primarily in the US, considering that rotating from putting together AI -generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The firm utilizes its own AI tools to generate them, based upon an open source large language model.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who produced it, can purchase any further copies.

There is presently no barrier to anyone creating one in any person's name, including celebs - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around violent material. Each book consists of a printed disclaimer stating that it is fictional, produced by AI, and created "exclusively to bring humour and joy".

Legally, the copyright comes from the firm, however Mr Mashiach stresses that the product is planned as a "customised gag present", and the books do not get offered further.

He hopes to expand his range, producing different categories such as sci-fi, and maybe offering an autobiography service. It's developed to be a light-hearted type of consumer AI - selling AI -generated products to human clients.

It's also a bit scary if, like me, you write for a living. Not least because it most likely took less than a minute to generate, and it does, definitely in some parts, sound simply like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then produce comparable material based upon it.

"We need to be clear, when we are discussing information here, we in fact mean human developers' life works," states Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI companies to respect creators' rights.

"This is books, this is posts, this is pictures. It's works of art. It's records ... The whole point of AI training is to learn how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a song including AI -generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms since it was not their work and they had actually not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's developer trying to choose it for a Grammy award. And although the artists were fake, it was still wildly popular.

"I do not believe using generative AI for imaginative functions need to be banned, but I do think that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on individuals's work without permission need to be prohibited," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be really powerful however let's build it fairly and fairly."

OpenAI says Chinese rivals using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and dents America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have actually selected to block AI developers from trawling their online content for training functions. Others have chosen to team up - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for example.

The UK federal government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would allow AI designers to use creators' content on the internet to assist establish their designs, unless the rights holders opt out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "insanity".

He explains that AI can make advances in locations like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and destroying the incomes of the country's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in the House of Lords, is likewise highly versus removing copyright law for AI.

"Creative industries are wealth creators, 2.4 million tasks and a lot of pleasure," says the Baroness, who is likewise an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The government is weakening one of its finest carrying out markets on the vague promise of growth."

A government representative stated: "No relocation will be made until we are definitely positive we have a useful strategy that provides each of our objectives: increased control for ideal holders to help them certify their content, access to premium material to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more transparency for best holders from AI designers."

Under the UK government's brand-new AI strategy, a nationwide data library consisting of public information from a wide variety of sources will likewise be provided to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to enhance the safety of AI with, among other things, companies in the sector required to share details of the workings of their systems with the US government before they are launched.

But this has now been repealed by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do instead, but he is said to desire the AI sector to deal with less policy.

This comes as a variety of lawsuits versus AI firms, and especially versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been taken out by everyone from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comic.

They claim that the AI companies broke the law when they took their material from the internet without their permission, and used it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "reasonable use" and are therefore exempt. There are a number of factors which can make up fair usage - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing scrutiny over how it collects training information and whether it ought to be paying for it.

If this wasn't all sufficient to contemplate, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the previous week. It became the many downloaded complimentary app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it developed its technology for a portion of the rate of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's current supremacy of the sector.

When it comes to me and larsaluarna.se a career as an author, I think that at the minute, if I really desire a "bestseller" I'll still need to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the present weak point in generative AI tools for larger tasks. It is complete of inaccuracies and hallucinations, mediawiki1334.00web.net and it can be quite challenging to check out in parts due to the fact that it's so verbose.

But given how rapidly the tech is progressing, I'm not exactly sure the length of time I can remain positive that my substantially slower human writing and modifying skills, are much better.

Register for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the biggest advancements in global innovation, with analysis from BBC reporters around the globe.

Outside the UK? Register here.